Michel Foucault. "What Is an Author?" Twentieth-Century
Literary Theory. Ed. Vassilis Lambropoulos and David Neal Miller.
Albany: State University Press of New York, 1987. 124-42.
Foucault proceeds in a fashion that may be termed his signature,
for he does not wish to really pin down exactly what is an author
per se, and seeks to identify the author in terms of how
an author exists. The attention is thus turned away from a purely
historically or socially based definition, as the relationship
between the author and the text take center stage. This key
relationship is the principal focus of the essay. "I wish to
restrict myself to the singular relationship that holds between
an author and a text, the manner in a which a text apparently
point to this figure who is outside and precedes it." Foucault
accepts that the author is dead and the text begins to appear
more as a "game" of language, but this only raises more questions
as we see so many accretions that the author seems to attract.
What constitutes an author's work? What should be excluded or
included, and at what point does a person begin to function as an
author? Foucault also directs attention to the name of the author
and its role in classifying works, both works which fall under
one name and those which fall under another. Thus, one may say
that Baudelaire's poetry is Baudelairian, and one may also say
that the works of another poet may be Baudelairian. Foucault
situates the name of the author within those aspects which
comprise a broader authorial function. The author may also be
held as a standard of quality, Shakespeare or Flaubert or Austen
being a standard against which others works are judged. Finally,
the author may be considered an actual, historical person to
which the text points or refers. Holding tightly to his constant
interest in the discursive elements that comprise a given
society, Foucault designates the author as a function of
discourse itself. "In this sense, the function of an author is to
characterize the existence, circulation, and operation of certain
discourses within a society." What becomes clear is that Foucault
sees the author-function as one which reveals the convergence of
a complex web of discursive practices. As these practices change
or disappear and as new practices appear, the author-function
will necessarily reflect those changes. Thus, the author-function
can be described in sociohistorical terms as a practice or group
of practices. (John R. Durant.)
Return to Electronic
Text: Selective Annotated Bibliography.
Return to home
page.
Michael Hancher
Department of English, University of Minnesota
URL: http://umn.edu/home/mh/ebibjd1.html
Comments to: mh@umn.edu
Created 21 May 1995
Revised 17 September 1996