BARTHES OUTLINES his project:
"subjecting the image to a spectral analysis of the messages it can contain"
(22). Barthes chooses advertising images as the object of his study "because,
in advertising, the image's signification is assuredly intentional."
Levels of analysisBarthes notes:
The purely denoted image, Barthes recognizes, is not possible. However, audiences still recognize the (apparently) analogic relationship between the photographic image and the real world; that connection works to naturalize the advertising image. The denoted image naturalizes the symbolic message, it makes innocent the very dense semantic artifice of connotation (34). The study of the connotative level Barthes calls "the rhetoric of the mage." There is no fixed system for reading the image, for "the language of the image is not merely the entirety of the utterances emitted . . . it is also the entirety of the utterances received; such language must include the 'surprises' of meaning" (36). Further, the study is young, and as yet lacks any definitive breakdown of the components of connotative meaning. Should such a categorization of the "connotators" be achieved, it will constitute Barthes's "rhetoric." Larger implicationsAbove and beyond any semiological project to outline the rhetoric of the connotators, Barthes identifies the tension between the coded, connotative aspects of the image and the uncoded, denotative aspects of the image as reflective of a larger tension. "The world of meaning is torn internally between the system as culture and the syntagm as nature" (40). (David Beard.) |
Michael Hancher Department of English, University of Minnesota URL: <http://umn.edu/home/mh/txtimdb3.html> Comments to: mh@umn.edu Created 24 December 1997